In a featured episode of the Case Breakdown podcast, Ainsman Levine, LLC details the litigation of Daniels v. Savini — a hit-and-run case involving high-profile Pittsburgh figures and a complex investigative trail.
Overcoming Litigation Obstacles
While many firms might have declined the case due to early investigative hurdles, our team pursued the facts to secure a viable claim. Key challenges included:
- The “IZOMBIE” Plate: A transcription error initially led investigators to the wrong vehicle, stalling the case.
- The Denial: The defendant signed a sworn affidavit denying involvement in the accident.
- The Missing Witness: A critical eyewitness “ghosted” the legal team for two years before finally providing testimony.
Strategic Trial Results
Despite these obstacles, the defense’s final offer was only $6,700. Ainsman Levine, LLC rejected the low settlement and proceeded to trial with a bold strategy, focusing exclusively on non-economic damages to ensure the jury recognized the full extent of the client’s pain and suffering.
The jury returned a $225,000 verdict — nearly 34 times the insurance company’s final offer.
This result underscores the commitment of Ainsman Levine, LLC to seeing difficult cases through to the end and maximizing recovery for our clients.
We Fight — So You Don’t Have To
Decades of courtroom experience. Thousands of clients helped.
ES